Descriptivism versus prescriptivism

Descriptivist versus Prescriptivist

Having relatively recently taken my learning of the English language seriously, I have come across the idea of descriptive versus prescriptive language.

I have always thought that as long as the intended message is sent, received and understood, the way in which this is achieved is irrelevant.

What is Prescriptive language? This is where the rules are predefined, and then we use and enforce the rules. Whenever anyone misspells a word or uses incorrect grammar, they are publicly shamed for the greater good.

Descriptive language Is where the powers that be listen to how language is being used and the rules change based on – as far as I can tell – popularity. This is why the word ‘hangry’ is now in the dictionary. The word ‘hangry’ is the joining of hungry and angry used to explain the negative emotion that ensues when you are hungry.

Prescriptivists, such as teachers and editors are hangry for ‘correct’ usage of the language.

As someone who has had my fair share of constructive comments on my manuscripts, I have become increasingly aware that, in academia at least, grammar and punctuation seem to be as important as the message. Which is why I have been forced to learn the rules. There are a lot of rules. Many of which I forget almost immediately after reading them.

I think that the ‘rules’ are much more important when you’re fresh to a topic. If you have context for the situation being described you often ignore any incongruous statements and arrive at the correct endpoint regardless.

Pls kp rdng ths pst.

I Imagine art would be a lot worse off if the prescriptivists had their way, think of how many new-fangled words Shakespeare invented. English has more than twice as many words as any of its closest rivals, although it absolutely dwarfed by Arabic which has twenty times as many words as English. Does have a greater choice of words make a language better? Presumably, we could be more efficient if we had fewer words.

I have come to appreciate the prescriptive approach to language as a technical exercise, being ‘correct’ is always fun. Especially when you’re getting roasted in a comment section and need an easy win.

Overall, both systems need to exist, and both systems do exist. One system deals with enforcing the rules and therefore societal cohesion through the language; the other tries to understand how the language is actually being used.

I am happy there are both grammar Nazi’s enforcing the rules and artists breaking them, it makes for interesting reading.

Still, I need to improve my understanding of the core principles that make up the language lest I make a faux pas in social situations. These days I am much more likely to be speaking with prescriptivists than descriptivists, especially at academic functions.

If I don’t do nothing, I may just understand all the rules at some point.

Author: Louis

Spend less than you earn, Invest the surplus, avoid debt. Eat food, not too much, mostly plants

8 thoughts on “Descriptivism versus prescriptivism”

  1. You write “Descriptivists, such as teachers and editors are hangry for ‘correct’ usage of the language” – I thought this was presciptive behaviour? Either way, great post – I liked the meta inclusion of textspeak too. It’s an interesting topic (and at times, one which produces interesting ethical questions). Are prescriptive attitudes to language only found in institutions, do you think? Do you have any thoughts on “stop trying to make ‘fetch’ happen?”

    Like

    1. You’re correct I did mean Presciptivists. Thanks for the edit! Certianly from my experience I have only become aware of prescriptivism since entering University. Prior to that no one ever pulled me up on my mistakes.

      Like

  2. I’ve told by countless writers that my writing doesn’t fufill or follow the technical requirements for English but it’s just fine the way it is.

    That statement really grinds my gears. I mean I don’t even know what is wrong and you have an idea what is wrong but you won’t tell me either.

    And then I figured I struggled a lot with clauses. 😂

    Like

    1. I often tell people this when asked if something is correct English. As a native speaker living in a non-Anglophone country, people treat me as a custodian of the language and want to know my opinion on how best to express something in English. Personally, I would rather take a descriptive than prescriptive approach, and so long as what’s being said makes sense and the speaker/writer can articulate themselves, I tend to be quite laissez-faire over whether something is technically correct. I also worry that I’ll over-edit someone else’s words and take away their personal style.

      Like

  3. I think a point you failed to mention, is that in any given piece of writing a major consideration is your intended audience. An email sent to a boss will most like have a different tenor and level of “correctness” than an email sent to your best bud or your mom. Likewise, the format or the conveyance of a piece of writing will also have an impact on the level of “correctness”. A thesis will have a different criteria level than a text message even if the recipient remains the same.

    Great post. There are so many things to consider when we sit down to write. Thanks for the reminder. 😊

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s